I guess since there is disagreement, it shows that there is nothing to it, because in things that are certain, such as the law and science, we all know that people are just about unanimous, right?
No, it indicates that Christian claims of certainty are unlikely. I didn't say that there was nothing to it. And I never said that law and science were unanimous. I have said OVER and OVER that they are UNCERTAIN.
How many times do I have to repeat myself?
You are the one who needs things to be certain, but you have no proof that Christianity is certain.
Motives have nothing to do with how people see things, and besides, everyone is motivated about the same when it comes to the Bible. Also, everyone wants to know truth no matter what the consequences and therefore they are willing to sacrifice anything they need to in order to do what they know is right.
I didn't say this either. The only way you seem to be able to defend Christianity is with slander and exaggeration. That is dishonest.
Motives are not an indicator of truth. People can have the best intentions, but often the fool creates more harm than the tyrant. Suicide bombers give their lives for what they believe in but we don't call them right simply because they are willing to give their lives.
Christians are pretty much the only ones on earth who believe illusions and want people to accept things that are untrue and irrational.
All of the above are common knowledge and beyond rational dispute, right?
Again, I didn't say this. And it really doesn't matter.
If Christians believe in illusions, it doesn't matter if there are thousands of groups who believe in illusions. Christians still believe in illusions.
Smoke and mirrors is all you have.